[ Article ]

Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction - Vol. 36, No. 6, pp.321-332

ISSN: 1226-363X (Print) 2287-4054 (Online)

Print publication date 27 Dec 2024

Received 09 Sep 2024 Revised 30 Oct 2024 Accepted 07 Nov 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2024.36.6.321

강판전단벽의 구멍형상과 위치에 따른 골조의 구조거동에 관한 해석적 연구

황호준¹ ; 황보경² ; 유홍식³ ; 김영주⁴ ; 김태수⁵^{, *}

1석사과정, 한양대학교, 건축시스템공학과
2박사후연구원, 한양대학교 에리카, 인공지능 건설기술 연구센터,
3공학박사/수석연구원, 포스코 철강솔루션연구소
4대표, 한국건축구조연구원
5교수, 한양대학교 에리카, 건축학부

Numerical Study on Structural Behaviors of Steel Plate Shear Wall Frames with Different Hole Shapes and Locations

Hwang, HoJun¹ ; Hwang, BoKyung² ; Ryu, HongSik³ ; Kim, YoungJu⁴ ; Kim, TaeSoo⁵^{, *}

1Graduate Student(Master Course), Dept. of Architetural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 15587, Korea
2Post-doctoral Researcher, AI Construction Technology Research Center, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, 15587, Korea
3Researcher, Technical Research Laboratory Steel Structure Research Group, POSCO Global R&D Center, Incheon, 21985, Korea
4President, Korea Institute of Structural Engineering & Consulting, Busan, 47783, Korea
5Professor, School of Architecture & Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University ERICA, Ansan, 15587, Korea

Correspondence to: ^*Tel. +82-31-400-5131 E-mail. tskim0709@hanyang.ac.kr

초록

이 연구에서는 개구부가 없는 강판전단벽과 중앙개구부, 측면개구부 및 개구부형상과 위치에 따른 강판전단벽과의 이력거동을 비교하기 위해 유한요소해석을 수행하였다. 대상 모델은 1경간 3층 골조로 구성하고 총 6개의 모델를 계획하였다. 해석결과, 전체폭의 1/3의 중앙 개구부를 갖는 강판전단벽 골조는 개구부가 없는 강판전단벽보다 내력, 강성 및 에너지 흡수능력은 각각 75 %, 72 %, 74 % 로 나타났고. 양쪽 개구부를 갖는 강판전단벽 골조의 경우는 87 %, 90 %, 97 %로 나타났다. 개구부를 중앙과 단부에 교차로 배치한 복합모델의 내력, 초기강성 및 에너지 흡수능력은 개구부가 없는 강판전단벽 골조보다 강판의 응력집중이 완화되고 보에 충분한 소성변형으로 각각 10 %, 33 %, 20 % 높게 나타났다.

Abstract

In this study, a finite element(FE) analysis was conducted to compare the hysteretic behavior of steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) with and without openings, including central and side openings, as well as varying shapes and positions of the openings. The target models consisted of a single-span, three-story frame steel structure, and a total of six models were planned. According to the FE analysis results, the SPSW frame with a central opening equal to one-third of the total width showed strength, initial stiffness, and energy absorption capacity that were 75 %, 72 %, and 74 %, respectively, compared to the SPSW without openings. In the case of the SPSW with side openings on both sides, these values were 87 %, 90 %, and 97 %, respectively. The complex model with openings placed alternately in the center and at the ends exhibited strength, initial stiffness, and energy absorption capacity 10 %, 33 %, and 20 % higher than those of the SPSW without openings. This improvement was attributed to the mitigation of stress concentration in the steel plates and sufficient plastic deformation in the beams.

Keywords:

Steel plate shear wall, Finite element analysis, Ductility, Energy dissipation capacity, Opening shape, Opening location

키워드:

강판전단벽, 유한요소해석, 연성, 에너지흡수능력, 개구부 형상, 개구부 위치

Acknowledgments

이 연구는 2024년도 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 이공분야기초 연구지원사업(과제번호 No. RS-2024-00346347)의 연구비 지원으로 수행되었음.

References

Khan, N.A., and Srivastava, G. (2020) Models for Strength and Stiffness of Steel Plate Shear Walls with Openings, Structures, Elsevier, Vol.27, pp.2096–2113. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.037]
Deylami, A., and Daftari, H. (2000) Non-Linear Behavior of Steel Plate Shear Wall with Large Rectangular Opening, Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, pp.1–7.
Sabouri-Ghomi, S., Ahouri, E., Sajadi, R., Alavi, M., Roufegarinejad, A., and Bradford, M.A. (2012) Stiffness and Strength Degradation of Steel Shear Walls Having an Arbitrarily-Located Opening, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Elsevier, Vol.79, pp.91–100. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.017]
Jo, B.H, Oh, K.Y., Jang, D.H., and Lee, K.M. (2018) Seismic Performance Evaluation of 3-Bay Coupled Steel Plate Shear Wall on the Boundary Frame and Connection Type, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.30, No.5, pp.289–298 (in Korean). [https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2018.30.5.289]
Guo, Y., Hwang, B.K., Ryu, H.S., Kim, Y.J., and Kim, T.S. (2023) Numerical Study on Structural Behaviors of Low-Yield Point Steel Plate Shear Wall, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.35, No.6, pp.335–345 (in Korean). [https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2023.35.6.335]
Choi, I.-R., and Park, H.-G. (2008) Ductility and Energy Dissipation Capacity of Shear-Dominated Steel Plate Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.134, No.9, pp.1495–1507. [https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:9(1495)]
Park, H.G., Kwack, J.H., Jeon, S.W., and Kim, W.K. (2004) Framed Steel Plate Wall Subject to Cyclic Lateral Load, Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, KSSC, Vol.16, No.6, pp.781–792 (in Korean).
Dassault Systemes (2023) ABAQUS/CAE User’s Manual (Ver. 6.23), Dassault Systemes.
Applied Technology Council (1992) Guidelines for Cyclic Seismic Testing of Components of Steel Structures, ATC-24, ATC, USA.
Wang, K., Su, M.-N., Wang, Y.-H., Tan, J.-K., Zhang, H.-B., and Guo, J. (2022) Behaviour of Buckling-Restrained Steel Plate Shear Wall with Concrete-Filled L-Shaped Built-Up Section Tube Composite Frame, Journal of Building Engineering, Elsevier, Vol.50, 104217. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104217]
Shin, D.-H., and Kim, H.-J. (2022) Post-Buckling Strengths of Steel-Plate Shear Walls with Two-Side Clamped Boundary Conditions, Thin-Walled Structures, Elsevier, Vol.170, 108499. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108499]
Li, Z., Ge, L., Qi, Y., Geng, Y., and Teng, J. (2021) Design and Experimental Study of a Buckling-Restrained Steel Plate Shear Wall with Novel Buckling-Restrained Panels for Improving Bearing Capacity and Energy Dissipation, Engineering Structures, Elsevier, Vol.244, 112812. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112812]
Tan, J.-K., Su, M.-N., Wang, Y.-H., Wang, K., Cao, Y.-Q., and Li, P. (2022) Experimental Study on Cyclic Shear Performance of Steel Plate Shear Wall with Different Buckling Restraints, Structures, Elsevier, Vol.35, pp.469–482. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.021]